![]() |
Bert Blyleven For Hall of Fame: Answering the Naysayers
When Well, I wanted to address those faulty assertions one by one because Blyleven's case for the HOF is so compelling it is simply unfair to allow such comments to linger without being addressed properly. 1. "Blyleven didn't win a Cy Young Award or finish in the top ten often enough." With respect to winning the Cy Young Award, when did that become a requirement for membership? If it is, then I guess we'd better let As far as not placing in the top ten often enough, Blyleven had two more such rankings than Bunning and Marichal combined. He also had three more than Now let's take a look to see how many Cy Youngs and top ten finishes Blyleven should have garnered. AMERICAN LEAGUE, 1971 ERA IP SO W RSAA 1 Vida Blue 1.82 312 301 24 56 2 Wilbur Wood 1.91 334 210 22 54 3 Jim Palmer 2.68 282 184 20 26 4 Mike Hedlund 2.71 206 76 15 15 5 Bert Blyleven 2.81 278.1 224 16 26 6 Mel Stottlemyre 2.87 270 132 16 15 7 Dave McNally 2.89 224 91 21 16 8 Pat Dobson 2.90 282 187 20 19 9 Sonny Siebert 2.91 235 131 16 20 10 Mickey Lolich 2.92 376 308 25 16 After being named the American League's Rookie Pitcher of the Year as a 19-year-old in 1970, Blyleven led the league in strikeouts/walks (3.80), ranked third in Runs Saved Above Average (26), fourth in strikeouts (224) and adjusted ERA+ (127), fifth in ERA (2.81) and shutouts (5), eighth in complete games (17), and ninth in innings pitched (278 1/3) in his first full season. (Runs Saved Above Average or RSAA equals the number of runs that a pitcher saved vs. what an average pitcher would have allowed, adjusted for ballpark effects. ERA+ equals a pitcher's ERA, adjusted for ballpark, against the league average. An ERA+ of 100 is average.) In what was a microcosm of his career, Blyleven didn't receive a single vote for the Cy Young Award. In fact, only six pitchers even received points that year. For those voters who put a lot of credence on Cy Young finishes, it was as if Blyleven didn't even pitch that year even though he was obviously one of the top ten hurlers in the league. Blyleven didn't receive any support in 1972. He had a good season (3rd in K/BB, 4th in K, 5th in IP, and 8th in RSAA) but perhaps one that wasn't worthy of a top ten Cy Young ranking. I won't make a fuss here as I'd rather save that for later -- as in the very next year. AMERICAN LEAGUE, 1973 ERA IP SO W RSAA 1 Jim Palmer 2.40 296.1 158 22 54 2 Bert Blyleven 2.52 325 258 20 53 3 Bill Lee 2.75 284.2 120 17 41 4 Nolan Ryan 2.87 326 383 21 28 5 Doc Medich 2.95 235 145 14 22 6 Ken Holtzman 2.97 297 157 21 9 7 Mel Stottlemyre 3.07 273 95 16 22 8 Jim Colborn 3.18 314 135 20 18 9 Dave McNally 3.21 266 87 17 24 10 Bill Singer 3.22 316 241 20 15 The 23-year-old right-hander may have been the best pitcher in the A.L. in 1973, yet he finished seventh in the Cy Young voting. Heck, Bert might have been the best pitcher in all of baseball that year. He led the A.L. in K/BB (3.85), SHO (9), ERA+ (158), and -- for "cybergeeks" like me -- neutral wins* (26); was 2nd in ERA (2.52), K (258), WHIP (1.12), and RSAA (53); 3rd in CG (25); 4th in IP (325); and 7th in W (20). *a projection of the number of wins the pitcher would have been credited with if he was given average run support. Blyleven's seventh-place finish was the result of netting -- get this -- one point. Yes, that's right. One voter out of 24 saw fit to pencil Bert's name into the third slot on the ballot. The other 23 writers ignored him completely. Instead, they voted for This is a good time to stop and reflect for a moment. Just because Blyleven was treated unfairly back then, should the voters continue to overlook him today when it comes to the Hall of Fame? Convicted felons have served less time than The Dutchman. OK, maybe that was an anomaly, right? Nope, I wish I could say it was but, unfortunately, that's not the case. I'm here to report that Bert didn't receive a single vote for the Cy Young for the next 10 years (1974-1983). Is it possible that he failed to put up numbers worthy of such acclaim? I'll let you be the judge of that. Let's take a peek at how Blyleven fared the following year. I mean, I don't want to be accused of just cherry picking his best years. AMERICAN LEAGUE, 1974 ERA IP SO W RSAA 1 Catfish Hunter 2.49 318 143 25 38 2 Gaylord Perry 2.51 322.1 216 21 42 3 Andy Hassler 2.61 162 76 7 13 4 Bert Blyleven 2.66 281 249 17 32 5 Al Fitzmorris 2.79 190 53 13 23 6 Ferguson Jenkins 2.82 328.1 225 25 23 7 Nolan Ryan 2.89 332.2 367 22 16 8 Luis Tiant 2.92 311.1 176 22 33 9 Jim Kaat 2.92 277.1 142 21 26 10 Jim Perry 2.96 252 71 17 20 In 1974, Blyleven was 2nd in K (249), K/BB (3.23), and ERA+ (142); 4th in ERA (2.66), WHIP (1.14), and RSAA (32); and 10th in CG (19). What did all that get him? Nothing. Nada. Zip. Zilch. Not one lousy point. So, once again, it was like Blyleven didn't even pitch that year for those writers who don't take the time to look beyond how many top ten Cy Young finishes he earned during his career. AMERICAN LEAGUE, 1975 ERA IP SO W RSAA 1 Jim Palmer 2.09 323 193 23 45 2 Catfish Hunter 2.58 328 177 23 40 3 Dennis Eckersley 2.60 186.2 152 13 24 4 Frank Tanana 2.62 257.1 269 16 28 5 Ed Figueroa 2.91 244.2 139 16 19 6 Bert Blyleven 3.00 275.2 233 15 34 7 Vida Blue 3.01 278 189 22 14 8 Rudy May 3.06 212 145 14 15 9 Mike Torrez 3.06 270.2 119 20 8 10 Steve Busby 3.08 260.1 160 18 22 In 1975, the 25-year-old ended up 2nd in K (233), 3rd in WHIP (1.10) and RSAA (34), 4th in K/BB (2.77), 5th in CG (20) and ERA+ (129), 6th in ERA (3.00), 7th in IP (275 2/3), and 9th in SHO (3). Another outstanding year and another goose egg on the Cy Young scoreboard. AMERICAN LEAGUE, 1976 ERA IP SO W RSAA 1 Mark Fidrych 2.34 250.1 97 19 38 2 Vida Blue 2.35 298.1 166 18 37 3 Frank Tanana 2.43 288.1 261 19 25 4 Mike Torrez 2.50 266.1 115 16 29 5 Jim Palmer 2.51 315 159 22 31 6 Wayne Garland 2.67 232.1 113 20 19 7 Paul Hartzell 2.77 166 51 7 8 8 Bill Travers 2.81 240 120 15 18 9 Bert Blyleven 2.87 297.2 219 13 23 10 Gary Ross 3.00 225 100 8 5 In 1976, Blyleven was traded from the Minnesota Twins to the Texas Rangers. Nonetheless, he still had a typical Blyleven year, placing 2nd in SHO (6), 3rd in K (219), 4th in IP (297 2/3), 5th in K/BB (2.70), 7th in RSAA (23), 8th in ERA+ (125), and 9th in ERA (2.87) and CG (18). There was one fly in the ointment. Blyleven had a won-loss record of. . .gasp. . .13-16. It was the first time he lost more games than he won. Bert only had five such seasons in his 22-year career despite playing for teams that had a winning record less than half the time. Don't mind the nearly 300 innings pitched with an ERA of 0.65 below the league average. Focus instead on his losing record. Indicative of Bert's tepid run support that year, his first two wins with the Rangers were ten-inning, complete-game 1-0 shutouts. AMERICAN LEAGUE, 1977 ERA IP SO W RSAA 1 Frank Tanana 2.54 241.1 205 15 35 2 Bert Blyleven 2.72 234.2 182 14 39 3 Nolan Ryan 2.77 299 341 19 35 4 Ron Guidry 2.82 210.2 176 16 26 5 Jim Palmer 2.91 319 193 20 29 6 Dennis Leonard 3.04 292.2 244 20 32 7 Dave Rozema 3.09 218.1 92 15 29 8 Dave Goltz 3.36 303 186 20 29 9 Gaylord Perry 3.37 238 177 15 22 10 Dennis Eckersley 3.53 247.1 191 14 13 In 1977, Blyleven may have been the best pitcher in the A.L. once again. He led the league in WHIP (1.07) and RSAA (39); was 2nd in ERA (2.72), ERA+ (151), and shutouts (5); 7th in K (182); 8th in K/BB (2.64); and 10th in CG (15). He also threw a no-hitter against the California Angels in his final game that year. Based on his superb stats and no-hitter, one would think that Blyleven must have garnered some support with the writers. Au contraire. Bert failed to get a single point when it came time to vote for the Cy Young Award. Why? His W-L record was only 14-12 and voters were beginning to become infatuated with relief pitchers, naming After the 1977 campaign, Blyleven was traded to the Pittsburgh Pirates in the first four-team trade in major-league history. In his initial year with the Pirates, Bert finished in the top ten in K, K/BB, WHIP, ERA+, RSAA, SHO, CG, and IP. It was the eighth and ninth consecutive years that Blyleven placed in the top ten in RSAA and K/BB, respectively. Bert's numbers fell in 1979-80, yet he was among the top five in strikeouts both seasons and placed in the top ten in IP one year and K/BB the other. Blyleven was 2-0 with a 1.42 ERA in the 1979 postseason, tossing four scoreless innings in relief to win Game Five of the World Series as the Pirates went on to defeat the Baltimore Orioles in seven. AMERICAN LEAGUE, 1981 ERA IP SO W RSAA 1 Sammy Stewart 2.32 112.1 57 4 16 2 Steve McCatty 2.33 185.2 91 14 23 3 Dennis Lamp 2.41 127 71 7 17 4 Tommy John 2.63 140.1 50 9 15 5 Britt Burns 2.64 156.2 108 10 17 6 Larry Gura 2.72 172.1 61 11 17 7 Ron Guidry 2.76 127 104 11 12 8 Bert Blyleven 2.88 159.1 107 11 9 9 Ken Forsch 2.88 153 55 11 16 10 Dennis Leonard 2.99 201.2 107 13 14 Blyleven pitched for the Cleveland Indians in the strike-shortened 1981 season. He found the A.L. to his liking, ranking 3rd in K (107) and K/BB (2.67); 8th in WHIP (1.16) and ERA (2.88); 9th in ERA+ (126) and CG (9); and 10th in W (11). It was the 11th consecutive year in which Blyleven finished in the top seven in strikeouts. As far as the Cy voting went, no can do. A severe elbow injury sidelined Blyleven for most of 1982 and part of 1983. AMERICAN LEAGUE, 1984 ERA IP SO W RSAA 1 Mike Boddicker 2.79 261.1 128 20 27 2 Dave Stieb 2.83 267 198 16 35 3 Bert Blyleven 2.87 245 170 19 40 4 Phil Niekro 3.09 215.2 136 16 15 5 Geoff Zahn 3.12 199.1 61 13 20 6 Bud Black 3.12 257 140 17 23 7 Storm Davis 3.12 225 105 14 15 8 Doyle Alexander 3.13 261.2 139 17 26 9 Ray Burris 3.15 211.2 93 13 13 10 Frank Viola 3.21 257.2 149 18 29 In 1984, Blyleven rebounded with one of the best seasons of his career. He actually earned some respect from the writers that year -- ranking third in the Cy Young voting -- although he arguably deserved even better. Bert led the league in RSAA (40); placed 2nd in W (19), WHIP (1.13), and ERA+ (142); 3rd in ERA (2.87) and SHO (4); 4th in K (170) and CG (12); and 8th in K/BB (2.30) despite playing for a ballclub with a 75-87 record that ended up sixth in a seven-team division. A broken bone in Bert's right foot cost him at least four starts, a chance at 20 wins, and possibly the Cy Young Award. He received more first-place votes than any starting pitcher that year but, as luck would have it, two relievers -- AMERICAN LEAGUE, 1985 ERA IP SO W RSAA 1 Dave Stieb 2.48 265 167 14 47 2 Charlie Leibrandt 2.69 237.2 108 17 39 3 Bret Saberhagen 2.87 235.1 158 20 34 4 Jimmy Key 3.00 212.2 85 14 26 5 Bert Blyleven 3.16 293.2 206 17 31 6 Tom Seaver 3.17 238.2 134 16 25 7 Ron Guidry 3.27 259 143 22 18 8 Charlie Hough 3.31 250.1 141 14 36 9 Jack Morris 3.33 257 191 16 31 10 Dan Petry 3.36 238.2 109 15 28 Blyleven split the 1985 season between the Indians and the Twins. The workhorse led the A.L. in IP (293 2/3), CG (24), SHO (5), and K (206); ranked 4th in K/BB (2.75); 5th in W (17), ERA (3.16), and RSAA (31); 6th in ERA+ (135); and 7th in WHIP (1.15). He also led the league in neutral wins (21) for the second time in his career. Bert picked up one first-place vote and wound up third in the Cy Young race for the second year in a row. Since 1985, no pitcher has thrown more innings in a season than Blyleven's total that year. The 35-year-old veteran led the league in IP (271 2/3) the following season, as well as in K/BB (3.71); placed 2nd in CG (16), 4th in K (215) and SHO (3), 6th in W (17), 7th in WHIP (1.18), and 10th in RSAA (19). He also gave up 50 HR in 1986, a record that still stands today. Be that as it may, Blyleven actually gave up fewer homers than the league average during his career. Blyleven won 15 games in 1987 plus three more in the postseason as he led the Twins to a World Series upset over the St. Louis Cardinals. After a disappointing season in 1988, Blyleven was traded to the Angels where he earned Comeback Player of the Year honors. AMERICAN LEAGUE, 1989 ERA IP SO W RSAA 1 Bret Saberhagen 2.16 262.1 193 23 44 2 Chuck Finley 2.57 199.2 156 16 26 3 Mike Moore 2.61 241.2 172 19 36 4 Bert Blyleven 2.73 241 131 17 28 5 Kirk McCaskill 2.93 212 107 15 19 6 Chris Bosio 2.95 234.2 173 15 20 7 Bob Welch 3.00 209.2 137 17 22 8 Mark Gubicza 3.04 255 173 15 18 9 John Cerutti 3.07 205.1 69 11 13 10 Tom Candiotti 3.10 206 124 13 21 The 38-year-old bearded wonder led the league in SHO (5); ranked 3rd in WHIP (1.12) and RSAA (28); 4th in ERA (2.73), ERA+ (140), and CG (8); 5th in K/BB (2.98); 6th in W (17); and 7th in IP (241). For his efforts, Blyleven finished fourth in the Cy Young balloting that year. Blyleven pitched two more seasons before retiring in the spring of 1993. Although Blyleven didn't win a Cy Young Award during his 22-year career, a pretty strong case could be made on his behalf in 1973, 1977, 1984, and 1985. Furthermore, Bert should have placed in the top ten as many as a dozen times. To the extent that he didn't, it should be noted that not only was Blyleven regularly ignored by writers but they were only allowed to vote for first, second, and third in contrast to the Most Valuable Player balloting in which these same voters rank their selections from one to ten. The bottom line is that Blyleven was one of the top ten pitchers in the league often enough that his record would reflect it had the writers been given the opportunity to vote for ten pitchers rather than three. I think it is safe to say that the season-by-season analysis and commentary debunks the idea that he failed to produce enough "Cy Young type" seasons. Fool us once (Cy Young voting), shame on you. Fool us twice (Hall of Fame voting) and we're not going to sit back and take it anymore. 2. "Blyleven wasn't a dominant pitcher in his era." Really? If striking out batters is a pretty good indication of dominance, there is no doubt that Blyleven was one of the most dominant pitchers of his era. To wit, Bert led the league in Ks once and placed among the top five 13 times! Blyleven, in fact, is fifth in career strikeouts. The players immediately ahead of him and behind him are all in the Hall of Fame other than CAREER STRIKEOUTS SO 1 Nolan Ryan 5714 2 Roger Clemens 4317 3 Randy Johnson 4161 4 Steve Carlton 4136 5 Bert Blyleven 3701 6 Tom Seaver 3640 7 Don Sutton 3574 8 Gaylord Perry 3534 9 Walter Johnson 3509 10 Phil Niekro 3342 If the above isn't convincing enough, Blyleven is tied for sixth all-time in the number of 200-strikeout seasons. The 11 pitchers below were about as dominant as they come. NUMBER OF SEASONS 1 Nolan Ryan 15 T2 Randy Johnson 12 T2 Roger Clemens 12 4 Tom Seaver 10 5 Bob Gibson 9 T6 Pedro Martinez 8 T6 Bert Blyleven 8 T6 Steve Carlton 8 T6 Gaylord Perry 8 T10 Mickey Lolich 7 T10 Walter Johnson 7 I can hear the argument now. Eight seasons of 200 or more whiffs might suggest Blyleven had a very good and long career but he just didn't have the peak that great pitchers are known to have. Well, you can shoot that one down, too, because Bert is tied for fourth all-time in the number of consecutive seasons with 200 or more Ks. The pitchers ranked ahead of Blyleven are three of the best in the history of the game and that Koufax fellow wasn't too bad either. CONSECUTIVE SEASONS 1 Tom Seaver 1968-76 9 T2 Walter Johnson 1910-16 7 T2 Roger Clemens 1986-92 7 T4 Sandy Koufax 1961-66 6 T4 Sam McDowell 1965-70 6 T4 Mickey Lolich 1969-74 6 T4 Bert Blyleven 1971-76 6 T4 Randy Johnson 1997-02 6 T9 John Clarkson 1885-89 5 T9 Bob Gibson 1962-66 5 T9 Ferguson Jenkins 1967-71 5 T9 Nolan Ryan 1976-80 5 T9 Nolan Ryan 1987-91 5 T9 Randy Johnson 1991-95 5 T9 Pedro Martinez 1996-00 5 If you don't like strikeouts as a measure of dominance, how 'bout shutouts (as I wring my hands)? Blyleven led the league in shutouts three separate times and ranked among the top five nine times. He is ninth all-time in this category, surrounded by a who's who of the greatest pitchers ever. CAREER SHUTOUTS SHO 1 Walter Johnson 110 2 Grover C Alexander 90 3 Christy Mathewson 79 4 Cy Young 76 5 Eddie Plank 69 6 Warren Spahn 63 T7 Nolan Ryan 61 T7 Tom Seaver 61 9 Bert Blyleven 60 10 Don Sutton 58 If you're not a stats guy, then try this on for size. Ask any ballplayer from the 1970s and 1980s who had the best curveball and, almost to a man, they will tell you "Bert Blyleven." Strikeouts. Shutouts. Uncle Charlies. Blyleven was dominant and among the very best in all three areas. 3. "Blyleven was no better than Tommy John or Jim Kaat and neither of them are in the Hall of Fame." According to Baseball-Reference.com, the most similar pitchers to Blyleven are as follows: Don Sutton (914) * *denotes Hall of Famer Sutton and I guess it's not enough that eight of the ten comps are in the Hall of Fame. The naysayers would rather focus on the similarities between Blyleven vs. John and Kaat. OK, I can deal with that. First of all, these two left-handers were outstanding in their own right and are certainly more worthy candidates for the Hall of Fame than several inductees. Secondly, Blyleven was even better. Although Bert's superiority may not show up immediately upon a cursory glance of the facts, the evidence is overwhelming when you dig below the basic statistics. IP W-L PCT ERA Blyleven 4970 287-250 .534 3.31 John 4710 288-231 .555 3.34 Kaat 4530 283-237 .544 3.45 There is no doubt about it, it is difficult to distinguish one from another when it comes to the stats above (which, unfortunately, is about as far as some voters get when reviewing the merits of these and other candidates). But let's dig a little deeper. ERA+ RSAA WHIP SO K/BB CG SHO Blyleven 118 344 1.20 3701 2.80 242 60 John 111 173 1.28 2245 1.78 162 46 Kaat 107 144 1.26 2461 2.27 180 31 Blyleven beats John and Kaat across the board in ERA+, Runs Saved Above Average, WHIP, Strikeouts, Strikeouts/Walks, Complete Games, and Shutouts. The most telling stat of all is RSAA. Blyleven saved nearly twice as many runs as John and 200 more than Kaat over the course of their careers. Another stat that distinguishes Blyleven from his peers is neutral wins and losses. Had Blyleven received league average run support, he would have ended up with a 313-224 W-L record, whereas John's (284-235) and Kaat's (282-238) totals would have remained virtually the same. Why are Blyleven's adjusted numbers so much better than John's and Kaat's? In a nutshell, Blyleven played for weaker teams than John and Kaat, received less run support, and he also pitched in more difficult ballparks. Lastly, I would like to point out that Blyleven meets or exceeds the average Hall of Famer in three of the four de facto standards developed by James, while John and Kaat meet just one each. Only 21 pitchers in the history of the game have met all four standards, including just nine who began their careers after World War II. Here is where they stand with their overall rank in parentheses. Bert Blyleven Black Ink: Pitching - 16 (128) (Average HOFer ~ 40) Tommy John Black Ink: Pitching - 8 (276) (Average HOFer ~ 40) Jim Kaat Black Ink: Pitching - 19 (98) (Average HOFer ~ 40) John and Kaat were very good pitchers, but Blyleven was clearly better than both of them. As shown in the similarity scores above, Blyleven is more like Sutton and Perry than anyone else. There are only two differences between Sutton/Perry and Blyleven. Sutton and Perry each won 300 games and are in the Hall of Fame. Blyleven fell 13 games short and is not in the Hall of Fame. Had Bert pitched under more favorable conditions, I don't think any rational voter could conclude that he would not have won 300 games. Besides, if winning 300 games is what it takes, why are such well-known oldtimers as Bert Blyleven. 5th in Strikeouts. 9th in Shutouts. 24th in Wins. Not to mention 17th in Runs Saved Above Average and 15th in Neutral Wins. There is no doubt about it. That is a Hall of Fame resume. Here's hoping the voters take the time to check it out thoroughly. [Additional reader comments and retorts at Baseball Primer.] |
Comments
AMEN!
Posted by: AgRyan04 at December 24, 2004 3:07 PM
Great post. Very informative. This should be required reading for all HoF voters. I've been appalled by Bert's lack of support.
Posted by: LargeBill at December 24, 2004 5:38 PM
Not only do I hope that HOF voters see this, but I think proactively sending this to as many of them as possible is the right course of action. Well done.
Posted by: BoboNewsom at December 24, 2004 6:21 PM
Rich,
Thought this might be of interest:
http://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/files/primer/discussion/25220/
-----------
trevise :-) ...
Posted by: trevise at December 24, 2004 11:11 PM
I predict -- and hope -- thatBert Blyleven will be the first player elected to the HOF based on the sophisticated analyses of internet-based baseball writers. These are incredibly persuasive posts, Rich, one hopes you are doing more than preaching to the choir!
Posted by: Paul at December 25, 2004 9:34 AM
Right on. Plus -- since postseason performance seems to make a difference for a lot of people -- he was an excellent postseason pitcher: 5-1 with a 2.47 ERA (2-1 and 2.35 in the World Series), contributing to two world championships for different teams.
Why do people always make this argument for Jack Morris, but ignore it with Bert Blyleven?
Posted by: Scraps at December 27, 2004 6:30 AM
it is getting to the point where you want to grab these nincompoops and scream "what is wrong with you?!" loudly into their faces. Great work, Rich, it's getting there. I hope Bert knows what's happening...
Posted by: rich II at December 27, 2004 6:55 AM
I just read another attempt (this one by a member of the Baseball Think Factory) at arguing against Blyleven's qualifications for the Hall of Fame.
From Traderdave:
"I'm a small hall guy and at first look, a 118 ERA+ is borderline at best."
My reply:
Hold on now. A 118 ERA+ over nearly 5000 IP is super. In fact, there is not one pitcher from the post WWII era with more innings and a better ERA+. Not one.
And that list includes Phil Niekro (115), Nolan Ryan (112), Gaylord Perry (117), Don Sutton (108), Warren Spahn (118), and Steve Carlton (115). Hall of Famers all. And pretty damn good ones at that.
Posted by: Rich at December 29, 2004 9:47 AM
Rich, as a huge fan of Mr. Blyleven during his playing career, I am very happy to see your analysis. I agree, his postseason stats and his no-hitter added to his wins, strikeouts and shutouts...that equals a no-question HOF'er.
I have one thing to add on his 1989 season: Bert was 17-5, and certainly should have won 20 games that year, but despite pitching for a fine (91 wins) Angels team, the culprit again was poor run support: He had 11 no-decisions, and his ERA was 2.46 in those 11 games! Slightly better than his overall 2.73 ERA for the season.
Bert also was overlooked for the All-Star game several times, none more glaring than in that 1989 season (he was 8-2 at the break, and leading the AL in ERA).
Posted by: Hal Horn at January 3, 2005 10:44 PM
Looks like some of the writers are starting to get the message. Having seen Bert pitch in Pittsburgh, I followed his career and always felt he deserved the Hall of Fame induction. Keep spreading the word and hopefully we'll see him there in 2 more years. Great work compiling the stats.
Posted by: Tampa Stosh at January 5, 2005 7:17 AM
Thanks for your excellent analysis that supports Mr. Blyleven's induction into the Hall of Fame. I shake my head every year wondering why the sportswriters consistently overlook him. He is well deserving of being in the Hall of Fame.
C'mon, you sportswriters, do the right thing and vote him in next year!!!!
Posted by: DJL at January 8, 2005 11:04 AM