Stealing Their Thunder Rather Than Bases
The number of stolen bases has been flat to trending downward for the past 30 years. Why? Well, in a nutshell, stolen bases are simply not as valuable in today's high-scoring environment as they were in the Dead Ball era or during the pitching-dominated 1960s and early 1970s or, for that matter, during a more neutral environment like the 1980s. Traditionalists may long for the next Ty Cobb, Maury Wills, Lou Brock, or Rickey Henderson, but the emphasis has moved away from base stealing to such a degree it is unlikely that baseball will produce another 100-stolen base season anytime soon. In fact, Vince Coleman may turn out to be the last player who built most of his value around his speed and baserunning ability. Yes, Marquis Grissom stole nearly 80 bases twice during the early-'90s, but he has transformed his game to the extent that the soon-to-be 38-year-old outfielder has hit at least 10 home runs for 13 consecutive seasons (including 20+ in three of the past four). Kenny Lofton has combined a nearly .300 lifetime batting average with sufficient walk totals to elevate his on-base percentage .031 above the norm -- making him much more valuable than just someone known for stealing bases. One might be able to make an argument on behalf of Otis Nixon, Brian Hunter, or even Tony Womack, but they each had just one season stealing 70 or more bases. I'm telling you, they just don't make thieves the way they used to -- or maybe they do but, instead of playing for the Dodgers or the Cardinals, these bandits chose to sign up with Enron and Worldcom and the like. Only one player has stolen 70 bases during the first five years of the current century. His name? Scott Podsednik. The year? 2004. Let's take a look at the top 20 stolen base leaders for last season. 2004 STOLEN BASE LEADERS PLAYER TEAM SB Scott Podsednik Mil 70 Carl Crawford TB 59 Juan Pierre Fla 45 Carlos Beltran KC/Hou 42 Bobby Abreu Phi 40 Dave Roberts Bos/LA 38 Ryan Freel Cin 37 Ichiro Suzuki Sea 36 Chone Figgins Ana 34 Endy Chavez Mon 32 Corey Patterson ChC 32 Jimmy Rollins Phi 30 Rafael Furcal Atl 29 Brian Roberts Bal 29 Alex Rodriguez NYY 28 Tony Womack StL 26 Cesar Izturis LA 25 Derek Jeter NYY 23 Matt Lawton Cle 23 Mike Cameron NYM 22 Only two players even stole 50 bases and only five nabbed 40 or more. How valuable were these stolen bases? Here are the stolen base leaders in the context of caught stealing. SB LEADERS WITH CS TOTALS PLAYER TEAM SB CS Scott Podsednik Mil 70 13 Carl Crawford TB 59 15 Juan Pierre Fla 45 24 Carlos Beltran KC/Hou 42 3 Bobby Abreu Phi 40 5 Dave Roberts Bos/LA 38 3 Ryan Freel Cin 37 10 Ichiro Suzuki Sea 36 11 Chone Figgins Ana 34 13 Endy Chavez Mon 32 7 Corey Patterson ChC 32 9 Jimmy Rollins Phi 30 9 Rafael Furcal Atl 29 6 Brian Roberts Bal 29 12 Alex Rodriguez NYY 28 4 Tony Womack StL 26 5 Cesar Izturis LA 25 9 Derek Jeter NYY 23 4 Matt Lawton Cle 23 9 Mike Cameron NYM 22 6 Juan Pierre stands out in the above table for the number of times caught attempting to steal a base. Pierre was thrown out so often, he would be well advised to just stay put. I know that flies in the face of conventional wisdom, but there is no disputing the facts here. James Click of Baseball Prospectus has demonstrated that the breakeven point for stealing second base is approximately 73%, and it ranges from 70% to 93% (depending upon the number of outs) for stealing third base. OUTS STOLEN BASE BREAKEVEN 0 Second 73.2% 1 Second 73.1% 2 Second 73.2% 0 Third 74.8% 1 Third 69.5% 2 Third 92.7% In other words, if a player isn't successful about three-quarters of the time, then he is doing more harm than good by attempting to steal bases. I realize there are some other factors at play here, such as the score, who's pitching, and who's at bat. But, generally speaking, a baserunner needs to be called safe nearly three times as often as out when taking that extra 90 feet. To determine the most efficient base stealers, I devised a simple formula in which I took stolen bases minus two times caught stealing. The reason behind this logic is twofold: 1. A baserunner who is caught stealing not only produces an out, but he also removes himself from the basepaths. It truly is a double whammy. 2. The breakeven point is 67% or slightly below the needed success rate to justify the event in the first place. I could have used three times rather than two to come up with a 75% breakeven point. I decided to err on the side of conservatism, plus I think it is slightly easier to compute the net number in your head using two times rather than three. I'm a big fan of KISS -- and I don't mean Gene Simmons. Keep it simple, stupid. MOST EFFICIENT BASE STEALERS PLAYER TEAM SB CS SB-(2*CS) Scott Podsednik Mil 70 13 44 Carlos Beltran KC/Hou 42 3 36 Dave Roberts Bos/LA 38 3 32 Bobby Abreu Phi 40 5 30 Carl Crawford TB 59 15 29 Alex Rodriguez NYY 28 4 20 Endy Chavez Mon 32 7 18 Ryan Freel Cin 37 10 17 Rafael Furcal Atl 29 6 17 Lew Ford Min 20 2 16 Tony Womack StL 26 5 16 Derek Jeter NYY 23 4 15 Eric Byrnes Oak 17 1 15 Jose Reyes NYM 19 2 15 Ichiro Suzuki Sea 36 11 14 Corey Patterson ChC 32 9 14 Darin Erstad Ana 16 1 14 Luis Castillo Fla 21 4 13 Luis Rivas Min 15 1 13 Jimmy Rollins Phi 30 9 12 Jeff Davanon Ana 18 3 12 Podsednik is not only the most prolific base stealer, but he also happens to be the most efficient. Carlos Beltran would be number one if I chose to subtract three times the number of CS rather than two times. Lew Ford, Eric Byrnes, Jose Reyes, Darin Erstad, Luis Castillo, Luis Rivas, and Jeff Davanon all show up for their efficiency even though none of them finished in the top 20 in stolen bases. If the players in the table above are the most efficient base stealers, who are the least efficient? MOST INEFFICIENT BASE STEALERS PLAYER TEAM SB CS SB-(2*CS) David DeJesus KC 8 11 -14 Juan Uribe CWS 9 11 -13 Casey Blake Cle 5 8 -11 Bernie Williams NYY 1 5 -9 Luis A Gonzalez Col 1 5 -9 Jason Bay Pit 4 6 -8 Gary Sheffield NYY 5 6 -7 Milton Bradley LA 15 11 -7 Jeromy Burnitz Col 5 6 -7 Jacque Jones Min 13 10 -7 Michael Barrett ChC 1 4 -7 Quinton McCracken Sea/Ari 3 5 -7 Alex Sanchez Det 19 13 -7 Manny Ramirez Bos 2 4 -6 Andruw Jones Atl 6 6 -6 Dustan Mohr SF 0 3 -6 Todd Walker ChC 0 3 -6 Paul LoDuca LA/Fla 4 5 -6 Coco Crisp Cle 20 13 -6 Bobby Hill Pit 0 3 -6 Henry Blanco Min 0 3 -6 Ross Gload CWS 0 3 -6 Raul Mondesi Ana/Pit 0 3 -6 Every player above is literally costing his team outs and potentially runs and even wins. Milton Bradley, Jacque Jones, Alex Sanchez, and Coco Crisp might win their fantasy baseball owners a few extra points, but they are a net negative for their real owners -- at least as far as stealing bases goes. I suggest these players lose their CS (and SB) as well as their fancy names. Look, if you can't be in or around Mister Roberts' neighborhood (as in Padre outfielder Dave), then you may as well forget about trying to stealing bases altogether. Interestingly, speaking of fancy names, Juan Pierre was the most inefficient base stealer in the majors last year using the more aggressive three times CS in the inputs. Rather than being the best base stealer in baseball as chosen by scouts in Sean McAdam's Hot Stove Heaters article for ESPN in January, Pierre is arguably the worst. I got a big kick out of the following comment from a so-called "talent evaluator": "He steals when it means something. He's not padding his total. Everyone knows he's going and he still makes it most of the time. That, to me, is the mark of a really great basestealer." Does that also mean Pierre is thrown out when it doesn't mean anything? Well, for fun, I decided to check to see what Florida's record was in games Pierre stole a base and in games he was caught stealing. It turns out the Marlins were 22-15 in games in which Pierre recorded a SB and 11-12 when he had a CS. This finding may not be statistically significant although it could shed some light on the value of stolen bases and caught stealings in the context of a team's wins and losses. The bottom line is that "making it most of the time" is not good enough. And it's certainly not "the mark of a really great base stealer." |
Comments
I'm a little confused about if/when caught stealing stats include pickoffs, but let me tell you that Bradley got picked off a number of times last season. Don't want to see him on base against Andy Pettitte, ever.
Posted by: Jon at March 14, 2005 11:41 AM
If the baserunner is out at second, it counts as caught stealing; if he's out at first, it's a pickoff. Anything else (as in tagged out on the basepaths) I'm not sure; liely scorer's discretion. Or perhaps it matters in which direction he's running?
Posted by: Morisseau at March 14, 2005 3:36 PM
I like the first chart - the utility of the second one seems to me to be somewhat smaller without being able to determine how many of those were hit and runs gone awry. I would think that the Henry Blanco's of the world tend to be taking off on the manager's intructions, rather than their own idea.
Posted by: Chris B at March 14, 2005 3:56 PM
Some managers hold the philosphy that an aggressive base running team puts pressure on the defense and particularly the pitcher. Lou Pinella being the classic example.
Though I have seen similar stolen base essays before I am not sure that anyone has ever quantified what base running pressure does for an offense. The defense is playing closer to the bag to get the tag opening up holes in the infield. The pitcher's concentration is split between the plate and the runner. One other aspect that should be examined is the offensively deficient lineup. Ricciardi's preference is a walk a bloop and a blast. Now the light hitting BlueJays have a different philoshpy. Heck Vernon Wells goal this year is 30/30
Posted by: Pete at March 14, 2005 6:35 PM
Nearly all the Hot Stove Heater articles were pointless - and wrong in the basestealing AND bunting departments on Pierre. With the exception of those that were written by Alan Schwartz, who actually came up with criteria for his "little things" and ran statistical analyses to determine the leader in each category.
I trust his numbers far more than the simple interviewing of a few scouts and coaches found in the other articles.
Posted by: Andy Rutledge at March 14, 2005 6:36 PM
CS do not officially inlcude pickoffs, which is a minor travesty of course. The numbers above, with all due respect to Rich, would mean a lot more with the PO numbers are included. Otherwise, it's like giving someone's BA without inlcuding bunt singles (or bloop singles, or some other infrequent but important event).
Actually, it's a lot like not including HBP's in a batter's or pitcher's line (a major travesty) or WP's for a pitcher (another minor travesty).
There are players who take such an aggressive lead that while they may have good SB/CS numbers, are prone to being picked off a couple to 3 time per season, or it is simply part of the cost of doing business (through litle fault of their own other than the fact that they are attempting a lot of steals).
And since the negative value of an out on base is so high (2-3 times that of the SB), it is that much more important to include PO's.
Again, with all due respect to Rich, I suggest that someone redo the above charts including PO's. I imagine that many of the final tallies will change significantly.
Last year, there were 153 PO's where the runner was actually out (there are some other official PO's where the runner ends up being safe on an error). Of course there are PO errors to offset some of the pickoffs, which are also not counted in the SB and CS totals. BTW, SB and CS totals can be a little misleading anyway. Some CS do not result in outs either (not that many), and of course there are SB errors (about 1 in 30 I think) that elevate the "normal" value of the SB.
Anyway, among the least efficient thieves, Bradley and Sanchez had 1 CS each (partial list).
Among the most efficient, Podsednick had 2 CS, Crawford 3, Furcal, Rollins, and Patterson 2 (also partial list).
Etc.
Posted by: MGL at March 14, 2005 6:45 PM
Though I have seen similar stolen base essays before I am not sure that anyone has ever quantified what base running pressure does for an offense.
Tango and I have a nice treatise about the effect of "basestealers" on the defense, the pitcher, and the batter, in our chapter on baserunning. You might be surprised at the data and the results. I am not saying that conventional wisdom is wrong or right, but as is often the case, conventional wisdom has no idea what is right or wrong (in this case). It is a complicated and complex dynamic (the effect of a basestealing threat or not on the defense, pitcher, and batter).
And of course, in general, the SB/CS break even point is lower in a lower run environment (e.g., a weak offense), and it is slightly more favored in a lineup of singles hitters (like the sac bunt), however, the idea that if a team does not have a lot of power, that the running game (and other small ball tactics) must be used more frequently is at best overstated and at worst, quite silly...
Posted by: MGL at March 14, 2005 6:52 PM
Having watched lot of Yankee games, my impression is that most of Bernie Williams and Gary Sheffields "caught stealing" were actually cases where they were running on a 3 and 2 count. I suppose that applies to others on the list as well, to some degree. Thrown out on a 3-2 count should be compared with DP's avoided when the batter hit a grounder as well as the extra base sometimes taken by the runner when the batter got a hit. I don't know whether the statistics allow one to distinguish between thrown out on real steal attempts vs. thrown out when running on a 3-2 count.
Posted by: David at March 15, 2005 3:31 PM
Take a look at the list of base thieves and you see another part of the problem: virtually all the players who can run these days either (1) don't draw walks or (2) hit for power and bat in the middle of the order. If you don't have fast guys who can get on first base a lot, you won't have a lot of steals (Kenny Lofton or maybe Shannon Stewart was the last primo base thief who was a patient hitter, although Castillo and Pierre fit the mold when they're batting .330)
Posted by: Crank at March 15, 2005 6:32 PM
I agree about the caught stealing vs busted hit and run. Those are manager plays, and really shouldn't be counted for or against the player.
Posted by: SFDave at March 15, 2005 6:33 PM
Here is a list of active players with seasons of >= 80 BB and >= 40 SB. Can you say slim pickings?
Like Crank says, you've got power hitters such as Bonds, Abreu, Beltran, and Guerrero. Among leadoff hitters, Lofton is on the list twice, as is Roberto Alomar. Biggio made it as well. Most surprised to see Offerman on the list. I would not have had him pegged for qualifying on either of those two stats.
Posted by: Rich Lederer at March 15, 2005 7:52 PM
It's probably too much work, but I think something like 3-year splits might be valuable here. I for one would be interested to see how variable it is from year to year how often people were caught stealing and such. Is Reyes especially appears he could be among the best in the category or not, if he played the full season, so it would be nice to look at a larger sample size. Also, I find myself wondering how Ichiro has done in previous years as it's hard for me to imagine him being thrown out that often given his speed, body control, etc.
Posted by: Jesse at March 16, 2005 6:17 PM