Minor League Notes (7/6/05)
Since I didn't have time for a normal full-length article today, I wanted to post a notes column, and I will be adding to it as the day goes on. THURSDAY UPDATE: Melky has apparently impressed New York brass so much that he will be called up today and play centerfield against the Indians. From the Midwest League to the Majors in a little over a year...wow. But sadly for the Yankees, I must say that I don't think Cabrera is going to solve any of their problems. And in case you were wondering, Bernie Williams didn't top the .800 OPS barrier until he was 25. Posted by Bryan at 10:32 a.m. CT In his last 28 games at high Class A Stockton, Barton reached base by hit or walk a remarkable 68 times, scoring 26 runs and driving in 25 in the process. Promoted to Double-A over the weekend, Barton was initially thought to miss Monday night's game due to a late flight, but he showed up at the ballpark and was intentionally walked in his first plate appearance, so word is getting around. Another reason Mr. Lederer went to the recent Quakes-Ports game was to see his long-time favorite, Jered Weaver. Despite disappointing in that game, and for much of his first three starts, Weaver seems to be getting back into his old groove. In his fourth start of the season last night, Weaver pitched five innings with no earned runs, allowing two hits and no walks against seven strikeouts. Granted, Bakersfield isn't exactly a prospect-laden ballclub, but there could not have been a more positive sign for the Angels bonus baby. Posted by Bryan at 11:33 a.m. CT On Sunday, June 5, Anthony Swarzak appeared to be a teenager in over his head. In the course of two innings -- the second and the third -- Swarzak both allowed more earned runs than he had all May, as well as more home runs than he had all season. The problem was, without question, the fastball (or lack thereof) that Anthony displayed. While the Floridian right-hander showed both the ability to keep his change-up down and garner strikeouts with a plus curve, the Clinton Lumberkings got the memo to lay off the slow stuff. Instead, Swarzak often found himself behind in the count, forced to throw strikes...and therefore, fastballs. The problem was that, in his first June start, Swarzak's velocity was down in the 87-88 region. On all three home runs the hitters pulled fastballs, which they had obviously expected, well over the fence. Furthermore, what Baseball America had described as a "tall and...lean frame" has noticeably added some weight. To continue to have the success he enjoyed in May, Swarzak must learn to control his secondary pitches while keeping his velocity in the low 90s. Next we have the Midwest League pitcher of April who still has an ERA under 2.00, Sean Gallagher: In a system that has been flush with pithcing from even before Kerry Wood, many were surprised when the generally unknown Gallagher dominated like no other Cub prospect in April. Gallagher did so with a bit of increased velocity -- in the 88-92 range -- and the slow, loopy curveball which is his strength. Gallagher's breaking pitch has the potential to be thrown for a strike, and froze enough Kane County Cougars to work as a strikeout pitch too. I found two significant problems when watching Gallagher, the first of which was -- as Michael Lewis would say -- how he looks in blue jeans. On the mound, Sean's delivery and appearance are reminiscent of Bartolo Colon, known best for his substantial weight. Gallagher's other problem is his lack of confidence in a third pitch, as he threw nothing but fastballs and his devastating hook. That could lead to problems in upper levels, but should he develop something else, I would guess he has Josh Fogg-type potential. Finally, we have Cubs outfield prospect Ryan Harvey, who is being moved through the system at about the slowest possible pace. Here was my impression: Harvey's presence at the plate is intimidating, as his large frame foreshadows the considerable power he has in his bat. Ryan's body is not too big to kick him from the outfield, as he should always have enough speed and certainly enough arm to stick in right. The problem for Harvey will always be contact, as his swing seems to be too long, yielding an all-or-nothing approach. Ryan seemed very similar to Jermaine Dye, so it would be good to expect plenty of good and bad seasons in the future. Posted by Bryan at 2:58 p.m. CT Jonathan Broxton, the other subject of that article, has not been so lucky in the earned run column. But, in his ten innings as a reliever, Broxton does have better peripherals having allowed just six hits, three walks, and striking out 14 batters. He has allowed one home run coming out of the pen, but it's hard to blame him, as it was against Delmon Young. Look for Broxton's ERA to start coming down as he gets more acclimated with mid-game stints. In other news, Bobby Jenks was called up by the White Sox, after having blown just two saves in 21 chances at the AA level. I drew considerable criticsm when I had Jenks ranked as baseball 31st best prospect before the 2004 season, in my first prospect list. But with this call-up, I'm not sure how many of the pitchers I ranked behind him I'd rather have: Joe Blanton (well, one), Gavin Floyd, Travis Blackley, Chin-Hui Tsao, John Maine, Adam Loewen, Jeff Francis (my other surprise inclusion on that list, and number two), Merkin Valdez, Denny Bautista, Ryan Wagner and Blake Hawkesworth. Posted by Bryan at 3:39 p.m. CT 1. Brian McCann (ATL): Huge power potential, walks enough, great contact skills. Incumbent atop this list. 2. Russ Martin (LAD): Most complete catcher in the minors. You know DePo loves that .453 OBP. 3. George Kottaras (SD): Great plate discipline, and gap power. In my opinion, Kottaras is the one Cal League catcher on this list not being especially helped by his surroundings. Question is whether those doubles will ever turn to HR. 4. Jeff Mathis (ANA): Hitting in AAA, but you have to wonder how much of that is because of the Salt Lake atmosphere. 5. Jarrod Saltalmacchia (ATL): I love him right now, and I think he will play even better when he gets away from that current stadium. 6. Miguel Montero (AZ): Early favorite for the Jeremy Reed/Ian Kinsler award, Montero's breakout is beyond unforeseen. The Cal League is helping him, but some of this is real. I'll remain a skeptic for now. 7. Kurt Suzuki (OAK): I'm not as high on Suzuki as most, but his dedication to discipline is a major plus. His defense is apparently awful, and I'm not sure his bat is enough to forgive that. 8. Neil Walker (PIT): Isn't having the results of some of these players, but the potential is there. Better catchers than him have had worse ISOs (.138) in their first full seasons. 9. Dioner Navarro (LAD): His age keeps him somewhat high on this list, but I'm just not sure he'll ever be much more than league average. He's walking more, but a .138 ISO in Las Vegas? 10. Kelly Shoppach (BOS): In the wrong organization, as he could be starting for a half dozen sub-.500 teams. His power and discipline are both huge strengths and are enough to carry the rest of his game that has quite a few weaknesses. 11. Mike Napoli (ANA): Another with plus plate discipline and plus power. I made the comparison in Spring Training, and I still believe it: Napoli is Aaron Rowand offensively. 12. John Jaso (TB): With Chris Shelton and Ryan Doumit graduating, Jaso is the next to hear Matt LeCroy comparisons for the next three seasons. Posted by Bryan at 5:25 p.m. CT |
Comments
Does Mathis break up the Brothers Molina next year? What's his ceiling like?
Posted by: Trev at July 6, 2005 10:58 PM
Trev, it's hard to say what the Angels will do. First of all, I should say that even despite his struggles this year, Jose Molina will likely be the club's backup catcher next year. The question will be whether the club chooses Molina or Mathis to have the regular job.
On one hand, Molina's contract is up at the end of the year, and he certainly stands to make more than the $3M he does now. On the other, he's having a career year offensively, with an OPS north of .800. Not to mention, he pretty much guarantees a 30% caught-stealing rate annually.
Mathis has a huge ceiling considering his huge power potential, but his inconsistency is a problem. Last year he started off great and slumped considerably from June on. This year, his numbers are again down, although not as much, from a good beginning.
I just don't see this club giving Mathis the job quite yet, meaning that by 2006, they are going to have more than a few blocked prospects that should be easy to acquire.
Posted by: Bryan Smith at July 7, 2005 7:28 AM
Is Garko off the list because you don't consider him a catcher or because you rate him below these guys?
Posted by: Joltin Joe Orsulak at July 7, 2005 8:27 AM
Thanks for the preview -- it's very interesting. Is Garko off the list because you don't consider him a catcher or because you rate him below these guys?
Posted by: Joltin Joe Orsulak at July 7, 2005 8:28 AM
Whoops! Sorry for the double post -- I realized I hadn't expressed my appreciation for the list and that the question might have come across as snarky nit-picking rather than actualy curiosity, which is what I had intended.
Posted by: Joltin Joe Orsulak at July 7, 2005 8:30 AM
Not a good day for me on the internets... "actual" curiosity. Ok, I'll stop now.
Posted by: Joltin Joe Orsulak at July 7, 2005 8:32 AM
In my mind, Garko isn't a catcher. He won't be catching for the Indians, and he isn't even doing it enough in the minors to justify putting him on that list. I like Garko a lot, and I think a Broussard/Garko platoon could do wonders in 2006.
Posted by: Bryan Smith at July 7, 2005 10:51 AM
Thanks for the list, it looks awfully good. I love that Jaso is on the list, but I read his comment to mean that he's all hit-no defense.
I'm just wondering where that scouting report come from? I've never read anything about him being subpar. Does it just come from him playing catcher only every other day and playing either 1B or DH the rest of the time? If so, I should mention that he has been credited for his athleticsm to play a good 1st base. His body looks nothing like Shelton or LeCroy's. I'm not saying that he is a good defensive catcher, just that I try to read everything on the Rays prospects and either I've missed something or others (because I've seen him described like this at a couple of other sites) are jumping to the wrong conclusion.
Posted by: Jay at July 7, 2005 3:59 PM
Has Guillermo Quiroz' stock really fallen this far? Also - what do you think of the Jays other up-and-coming catcher, Curtis Thigpen?
Posted by: Donkit R.K. at July 7, 2005 6:09 PM