Rodney Dangerfield's All-Stars
Since more than a few journeymen and subpar players have managed to parlay a good half season or being the least awful member of a terrible team into a spot on the All-Star roster (even the 1962 Mets and 2003 Tigers were represented), it can be hard to believe that some of baseball's better and more consistent performers never enjoyed that recognition. When his defense, intensity and long record as a winner is considered, why wasn't Rick Dempsey ever chosen? A .233 lifetime average doesn't reveal Dempsey's full value to the Orioles in the 1970s and 1980s. AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO AVG OBP SLG OPS 1993 515 93 146 35 1 31 95 82 135 .283 .387 .536 .923 1995 537 111 177 34 3 34 105 91 111 .330 .432 .594 1.026 1996 581 90 166 27 4 30 98 93 125 .286 .388 .501 .889 1997 582 95 172 28 1 33 129 95 142 .296 .401 .517 .918 2000 568 108 165 36 2 34 97 104 139 .290 .406 .540 .946There is always plenty of competition for the corner outfield slots, but how Salmon's all-around skills and stats were repeatedly ignored is a mystery. Conspiracy theories, anyone? Even baseball addicts often assume that Kirk Gibson was an All-Star, but it never happened. While the run production in his 1988 MVP season with Dodgers (25 HR, 76 RBI, .293) may have been mediocre by All-Star standards, Gibson's 31 steals in 35 attempts (.886) and a .381 on-base percentage were solid. There were two other seasons where Gibson merited serious consideration. The Detroit-area native hit .282 with 27 HR, 91 RBI and 29 steals for his hometown Tigers in 1984 and followed that up with a 29/97/.287 campaign in 1985 which included 30 steals in 34 attempts (.882). On a team that automatically sent Pete Rose, Johnny Bench, Tony Perez and (beginning in 1972) Joe Morgan to the All-Star Game, it's easy to see why Bobby Tolan was ignored. In 1969, Tolan came through 194 hits, 104 runs scored, a .305 average, 21 homers, 93 RBI and 26 steals in his first season in Cincinnati. He followed that up by hitting a career-best .316 with 34 doubles, 16 HR, 80 RBI and a league-leading 57 SB. After missing all of 1971 with an injury, Tolan came through with 82 RBI and 42 steals in 1972. Pitchers: With seasons of 20-11, 16-6 and 19-13, what does a guy have to do to get some respect? Paul Splittorff might be asking that question, as those performances never got the Royals lefty (1970-84) an All-Star invitation. The control specialist finished with a 166-143 career record. Left-handed, good control, not many strikeouts, small market - it sounds like Splittorff, but that description also applies to Mike Caldwell. Seasons of 14-5 (1974), 22-9 (1978), 16-6 (1979) and 17-13 (1982) didn't cost Caldwell any time off during the All-Star break. Bob Forsch didn't blow hitters away, but the Cardinals righty was snubbed in 1975 (15-10, 2.86), 1977 (20-7) and 1982 (15-9). The former minor league third baseman hit .213 lifetime. With more than a third of his 190 career hits going for extra bases (45 doubles, eight triples, 12 home runs), Forsch didn't try to slap singles. Seasons of 16, 17 and 18 wins from 1993 to 1997 weren't enough to push Alex Fernandez onto an All-Star roster. Honorable mention: John Denny, Storm Davis. Deserved another chance: Tigers outfielder Gee Walker hit .335 with career-best 213 hits and 113 RBI in 1937, but he missed his only All-Star opportunity due to an injury. Walker's numbers in 1936 and from 1938 to 1940 were worthy of All-Star consideration, but he wasn't chosen. While the annual All-Star Game is often described as a contest between baseball's best players, there are exceptions to that statement. Would you rather have former All-Stars Max West, Frank Zak or Mike Hegan on your team instead of Salmon, Gibson or Trosky? |
Comments
If only the phrase 'all star player' meant anything more than 'first half performer', then i'd grant it a lot more credence in determining the quality of any player. I really get tired of seeing people argue the HOF credentials of a player and list all-star appearances as a reason for or against a player, because really, the only relation is public opinion(whether it be sports writers, players, or fans), which, despite the obvious qualms one might have in adding that to a players true merit, does play a role in HOF worthiness. Impact on the public consciousness relating to baseball is in the 'gut instinct' category of HOF merit along with undeniable statistical production, and all star appearances should not transcend both of these categories of HOF merit. It lies purely in the 'gut instinct' category.
Posted by: bobbsktball at July 8, 2007 12:57 AM
I know it's just a fun and silly exercise, but isn't the better comparison to look at all these players' first-half numbers--or better yet, their numbers when the ballots came out? It may weed out some of the stranger cases you mention.
Posted by: Micah at July 8, 2007 6:12 AM
I know the all-star game is "for the fans," but I think the rosters from the player-chosen years were better representations of who was actually playing the best in that year.
Posted by: Bill Rogers at July 8, 2007 11:11 PM
This is a good topic, but I remember clearly that Kirk Gibson would've been on the team in 1988, but for one reason or another was not--I believe it was an injury. http://tinyurl.com/3drkz9 has an ebay auction of Gibby's all star Topps baseball card.
Posted by: John B. at July 9, 2007 1:42 AM
Angel fan here. Salmon always put up good numbers by the end of the season but he was notorious for poor starts and getting red hot as the weather warmed up.
Posted by: Dave at July 9, 2007 11:36 AM