ALDS Preview: Boston Red Sox vs. Los Angeles Angels
They don't start this one until later tonight but it's the one nearest and dearest to our hearts. So we're throwing it up first this morning. We will have the Phills/Brewers later on this morning (or at least before first pitch), the Cubs/Dodgers later in the afternoon and then we will run with the other ALDS series tomorrow morning. Al and Marc from The Baseball Analysts chipped in, and we have bloggers from around the web that are helping us, too. So stay tuned. Let's defer to last year's preview in order to set this year's up. Hi everyone. I'm the Baseball Beat guy. Patrick Sullivan and I are going to preview the American League Division Series between the Los Angeles Angels (94-68) and the Boston Red Sox (96-66). I've been a fan of the Angels since 1969 when my Dad was hired by then-general manager Dick Walsh as Director of Public Relations and Promotions. It was a tough job as there wasn't much to promote back then. Ownership has since transitioned from Gene Autry to Disney to Arte Moreno. Angels fans love Autry and Moreno, but did you know that the team won its only World Championship under Disney? The two of us attended another game this season – this time at Fenway Park. Our Sunday included breakfast with Bill James and Jared Porter, Director of Professional Scouting, followed by an afternoon tilt between the Red Sox and the Tampa Bay Rays, a young team that went on to win the AL East. We even had the opportunity to pose for a photo before the game. Today, we sit on the opposite coasts awaiting with excitement the first pitch to this year's ALDS. SCHEDULE Game 1: Wed., Oct. 1, 10 PM ET on TBS - BOS (Jon Lester) @ LAA (John Lackey) * if necessary RECORDS HOME ROAD TOTAL BOS 56-25 39-42 95-67 LAA 50-31 50-31 100-62 Head-to-head results: LAA, 8-1 OFFENSE RUNS AVG OBP SLG OPS OPS+ BOS 845 .280 .358 .447 .805 108 LAA 765 .268 .330 .413 .743 96 PITCHING AND DEFENSE RUNS AVG OBP SLG OPS ERA+ BOS 694 .250 .323 .390 .713 114 LAA 697 .261 .322 .406 .729 109 Position-By-Position Breakdown Catcher: Jason Varitek (.220/.313/.359, 13 HR, 74 OPS+) was awful this season. The Red Sox are the only American League playoff team who won't field a good catcher. In all likelihood, regardless of how far they advance, the Red Sox will yield ground to their opposition behind the plate. Varitek's awful September dashed any hope that his .264/.376/.431 August offered Sox fans. Rich says: This is the first time an Angels catcher deserves to get the nod over the Boston captain. Sully says: Not even close. First base: Kevin Youkilis (.312/.390/.569, 29 HR, 145 OPS+) was an American League MVP candidate this season and I wonder how many folks really know it. You look at the Red Sox record, run differential, runs scored, etc. and you wonder how they did it with all of the problems on offense (injuries to Lowell, Papi, Drew, the existence of Lugo and Varitek). Well, look no further than Youkilis and the guy positioned to his right. They became stars in 2008. Rich says: Both Tex and Youk can hit and field with the best but the edge goes to the Angels newcomer. Sully says: Narrowly, I give it to Tex as well. Second base: Dustin Pedroia (.326/.376/.493, 17 HR, 123 OPS+) may win the AL MVP (rightly or wrongly) and has emerged as a real team leader. As disadvantaged as Varitek makes the Red Sox compared to the other post-season catchers, Pedroia gives the Sox nearly as great of an advantage over the other playoff keystoners. Rich says: Pedroia is the easy pick here. Sully says: Agreed. Shortstop: Jed Lowrie (.258/.339/.400, 3 HR, 91 OPS+ in 81 games) took over full time shortstop duties after Julio Lugo went down with an injury. Looks like he might have Pipped him. Lowrie's numbers might not be anything to write home about but remember, this is not the turn of the century. Hanley Ramirez aside, shortstops no longer count among the game's best hitters like Nomar, A-Rod, Jeter and Tejada once did. Rich says: It's hard to get excited by either shortstop. I would call it a toss-up or a slight edge to Aybar for his defensive prowess. Sully says: Lowrie is no slouch defender and every bit the hitter the 2008 versions of Michael Young and Miguel Tejada were. His .117 BB/PA rate to Aybar's .037 tells you a lot of what you need to know about the differences between the two players. Third base: Mike Lowell (.274/.338/.461, 17 HR, 105OPS+) battled injuries all season long but could be a real wild card (heh) in this series. His start was horrendous, he crushed the ball in May and June, then stunk again as he battled injuries only to have a strong September when he was in there. Rich says: Lowell is the choice but only if healthy. Sully says: If Lowell is unhealthy and it forces Mark Kotsay into the lineup, Figgins gets the nod. Otherwise, yeah, just as Rich stated above. Left field: Jason Bay (.286/.373/.522, 31 HR, 133 OPS+) was a main reason that the Red Sox went 34-19 after Manny Ramirez left town at the trade deadline. He has been terrific since arriving here, and provides an incredible amount of lineup depth hitting out of the 6-hole. Rich says: Bay over GA. Way. Sully says: Nice, Rich. Center field: Jacoby Ellsbury (.280/.336/.394, 9 HR, 89 OPS+) led the American League with 50 stolen bases and was only thrown out 11 times. Since August 1, he hit .314/.352/.463 and stole 15 bases at a 79% clip. If that guy shows up, you can actually consider this one a draw. Rich says: You know what you're gonna get with Hunter. That's good enough to win this position battle. Sully says: Ellsbury seems over-matched against the hard throwers. Look for Lackey and Santana to pound Ellsbury inside. I don't think he will be much of a factor. Right field: Guerrero has struggled in two his previous playoff appearances against Boston, going 4-for-22 with just one extra-base hit. Moreover, his aggressive, first-pitch hacking approach has been exploited by other teams during the post-season as well (.183/.258/.233 in 16 games). JD Drew (.280/.408/.519, 19 HR, 139 OPS+), like Lowell, comes into the post-season as something of an unknown. When healthy and locked in, he is an MVP-caliber performer (AL Player of the Month in June). When shaky, he is still an asset. His walk-rate never goes anywhere. Rich says: Guerrero, but not by as much as the average fan might think. Sully says: A reluctant nod to Vlad because of JD's gimpy finish. Designated Hitter: David Ortiz (.264/.369/.507, 23 HR, 125 OPS+), like Drew, played in only 109 games this season. Ortiz hit six home runs in September and seemed to be hitting his stride heading into the post-season but even the most rose-colored view of Ortiz's current makeup would have to conclude that he remains a tick or two off of his recent dominance. Rich says: Give me Big Papi any day of the week. Sully says: I agree. Off the Bench: Brandon Wood (.200/.224/.327) struck out 43 times in 157 plate appearances but slugged four home runs in September when he earned more playing time than at any other point in the season. Jeff Mathis (.194/.275/.318) will back up Napoli behind the plate, Kendry Morales (.213/.273/.393 in only 27 games) and Robb Quinlan (.262/.326/.311) will be used as pinch hitters, and Reggie Willits (.194/.321/.231) is likely to be used as a pinch runner and defensive replacement as well as an occasional situational hitter off the bench. Coco Crisp (.283/.344/.407) steps right should Drew be unable to go. Either way, it is quite likely that he starts against Joe Saunders. Crisp, the switch-hitter, will take over for the left-handed Ellsbury against the Angels southpaw. Crisp plays a terrific center field and has turned back into a passable offensive player this season. Alex Cora (.270/.371/.349) is slipping as a defender but remains a tough out at the plate. It's hard to envision a scenario in which he takes much time from Pedroia or Lowrie but he could be used as a pinch-runner. Sean Casey (.322/.381/.392) is the slowest man on earth and has to be the worst fielding first baseman in baseball. He also seems like he is swinging underwater oftentimes. And yet, I am pretty sure I would categorize him as a net contributor this season. He might get a look or two as a pinch hitter. Mark Kotsay (.276/.329/.403) would in all likelihood start at first base should Lowell be unable to go and Youk shifts over to third. Kevin Cash (.225/.309/.338) is just awful. Rich says: Yuck. Not Youk. Just Yuck. Sully says: I will give a slight, unenthusiastic edge to Boston here. Starters: Ervin Santana (16-7, 3.49, 125 ERA+) finally realized his potential this season, earning an All-Star berth and leading the club in IP (219), SO (214), WHIP (1.12), and K/BB (4.55). The 25-year-old righthander throws the third-hardest average fastball (94.4) in MLB and a plus slider. He is scheduled to start Game 2. Joe Saunders (17-7, 3.41, 128 ERA+) surpassed everyone's expectations by making the All-Star squad and leading the staff in Wins, W-L%, and ERA. While considered a finesse pitcher, the 27-year-old southpaw's fastball sits at 90-92. He mixes in a plus changeup and an average curveball and occasional slider. He is slated to go in Game 3 at Fenway Park. Jon Lester (16-6, 3.21, 143 ERA+) was Boston's most dependable arm this season and is the second-best pitcher in the playoffs (behind only C.C. Sabathia). Go on, check it out. Johan Santana and Tim Lincecum are out on the NL side while Cliff Lee and Roy Halladay are eliminated from the American League. He's been remarkable all season long and given how battle-tested the kid is, I don't expect him to wilt out in California. Daisuke Matsuzaka (18-3, 2.90, 158 ERA+) was simply not as good as his numbers would have you believe this season. He walks too many batters and his formula for keeping runs off the board of always depending on stranding runners is unsustainable. He had one of the very flukiest pitching seasons that I can recall. Josh Beckett (12-10, 4.03, 114 ERA+) is sort of the opposite of Dice-K. Despite notching 18 more strikeouts, 60 fewer bases on balls and a considerably better WHIP, Beckett still ended up with the higher ERA than Matsuzaka. I expect their respective ERA's to reverse for the playoffs. Rich says: Too close to call. Sully says: I can't make a call here, either. Daisuke and Saunders are not as good as they would appear, Lackey and Beckett are probably better (but both come in with question marks) and Lester and Santana are both undeniably terrific. Relievers: Scot Shields (6-4, 31 Holds, 2.70, 161 ERA+) is a solid veteran set-up man. He didn't tire down the stretch as he has in past years. Jose Arredondo (10-2, 16 Holds, 1.62, 269 ERA+) may assume the role of closer next season but will serve as a bridge between the starters and Frankie during the 2008 playoffs. Darren Oliver (7-1, 12 Holds, 2.88, 152 ERA+) was more effective than ever this year. While Oliver is the only lefty in the bullpen, he is more than a LOOGY, averaging 1 1/3 innings per appearance. Jon Garland (14-8, 4.90) and Jered Weaver (11-10, 4.33) will be used exclusively in long relief in a series that only requires three starting pitchers. Jonathan Papelbon (5-4, 41 SV, 2.34, 196 ERA+) will be the reason the Red Sox lose this series should they go down. He has yielded an .822 OPS in September and seems entirely too dependent on a fastball that he is not even throwing as hard as he did at this time last season. Manny Delcarmen (3-2, 18 Holds, 3.27, 140 ERA+) Hideki Okajima (3-2, 23 Holds, 2.61, 189 ERA+) Justin Masterson (6-5, 3 Holds, 3.16, 145 ERA+) Javier Lopez (2-0, 10 Holds, 2.43, 189 ERA+) This bullpen, when you take the trio of suck that was Mike Timlin, Craig Hansen and David Aardsma out of the picture, was pretty damn good and really came together towards the end of the season. Paul Byrd and Tim Wakefield should offer depth (unless one is called upon to start Game 4). Rich says: I haven't given up on Paps yet. He is every bit as good as K-Rod in my judgment. The balance of the 'pens are equally solid. No blood. Sully says: I will give the nod to the Halos with Papelbon struggling coming into the playoffs. Rich's Prediction: An argument could be made on behalf of the Angels or the Red Sox. To wit:
Based on the above, there's nothing I can hang my Angels hat on except for two factors: 1. Home-field advantage. While I don't see the Angels returning the favor and sweeping the Red Sox this time around, I believe the AL West champs have what it takes to beat the AL wild card in five. Sully's Prediction: Boston beats Lackey twice and Saunders once but loses to Santana. I like the Sox in four. |
Comments
Thank you guys for a great article!
Before the injuries, I like the Sox; but factoring those in, I think this series will be very close and exciting to watch. I am hearing Angels fans poo-pooing the Manny-less and shell-of-a-Papi Boston lineup, but the Sox put up the 2nd most runs in the AL. This is a good offense.
I have to say that I think Santana is the best pitcher in this series (this year), but let's see how he does in the postseason. He's got the edge over Lester, but I think Beckett is clearly better than Lackey, as long as the oblique doesn't become an issue. It may reduce his velocity and force him to rely on secondary pitches more. Saunders has great numbers, but he's not as good as his 17 wins suggests, and the Sox have feasted on lefty pitching. Dice-K's ability or inability to control baserunners will be critical to this series.
The other thing I disagree about is Papelbon. He's been sticking to fastballs precisely to save his arm for the playoffs; now that it's October, you'll see him throwing harder and mixing in his slutter and changeup. I have zero concerns about him.
I am a Red Sox fan, but taking out my emotion, I have to think the Halos can take this one in 5. I will be overjoyed if Boston proves me wrong.
Posted by: Red Sox Talk at October 1, 2008 8:20 AM
This is the most exciting of the first round series. Great report, guys.
Posted by: Al Doyle at October 1, 2008 8:29 AM
Offense: Which team is better?
Ellsbury/Figgins
Pedroia/Anderson
Ortiz/Teixeira
Youklis/Guerrero
Drew/Hunter
Bay/Kendrick
Lowell/Rivera
Lowrie/Napoli
Varitek/Aybar
Defense: Which team is better?
C: Varitek/Napoli
1B: Youklis/Teixeira
2B: Pedroia/Kendrick
3B: Lowell/Figgins
SS: Lowrie/Aybar
LF: Bay/Anderson
CF: Ellsbury/Hunter
RF: Drew/Guerrero
This is the only way it makes sense to me. I do not see the point in comparing Ellsbury to Hunter, except defensively, when one leads off while the other hits 5th. And the same goes for each other position player. It would be like asking who was the better left fielder, Ricky Henderson or Manny Ramirez. Both extremely valuable but in completely different offensive roles. And depending on the overall construction of the team, you might prefer one or the other.
Posted by: Bob R. at October 1, 2008 10:08 AM
Bob: You've made this point in prior years.
To answer your two questions, based on the numbers (as detailed toward the top of the preview in the team offense and team pitching/defense comparisons), Boston was better at scoring runs *and* preventing runs over the full season.
The position-by-position breakdowns are designed to compare players at like positions. More to the point, we are comparing these players offensively and defensively. The fact that Ellsbury and Hunter -- or Henderson and Ramirez -- are different types of players does nothing to lessen our ability to compare them. If one is better than the other in the production and prevention of net runs, then he is better. It's really as simple as that. It doesn't much matter if one is better because of this skill or that skill.
The bottom line is that we have provided detailed comparisons at the team and player level, and I believe our format is logical and easy to follow.
Posted by: Rich Lederer at October 1, 2008 1:53 PM
I have raised the issue before (and also at Hardball Times this year) and will drop it henceforth. But I do think it remains a legitimate view. I do not at all disagree with the conclusions, but I do think a comparison of offense and defense should be done separately.
To consider my Manny/Ricky comparison, while Manny might be responsible for helping his team score more runs (maybe), he is probably a significantly worse left fielder and worse at preventing runs. To compare one to the other as both a left fielder and a hitter confuses the issue. In more extreme cases, the point would be clearer.
For example, Jeter is clearly a better player than Adam Everett. But Everett is undoubtedly a better shortstop. So while comparing shortstops gives the edge to Jeter as a far superior player, it does not help evaluate the two teams. If a team with Everett has 8 other outstanding hitters and lots of ground ball pitchers, Everett might be more valuable to them than Jeter would be, or if that is too much to swallow, he might at least not be as much a problem as the comparison might suggest. And that is even more the case should Jeter's team have someone like Gary Pettis (Melky?) in CF and batting 9th as Everett would.
I don't want to be a pain over this question. I suppose it is one of those things that simply gnaws at me. And I certainly respect your view of things and will not raise it again unless it is directly addressed by someone else.
Posted by: Bob R. at October 1, 2008 3:16 PM
We'll see how he does for the rest of the series, but it looks like Ellsbury figured out how to shellack Lackey's inside stuff pretty good. The report says that he's changed his hands after pitchers started to figure him out. If he looks anything through the rest of the series like he did last night, he'll be a factor indeed.
Posted by: Angry Sam at October 2, 2008 2:23 PM
Rich, you gave it to Bay because you and G.A. had words one time. Tell the truth. In your heart of hearts you would want Garret "Puddin'" Anderson in there over Jason "How Did I Replace Man-Ram Again?" Bay.
Posted by: Kory B. at October 2, 2008 8:41 PM
Re Angry Sam's point, Ellsbury supposedly worked with the Sox's hitting coach, Dave Magadan, at taking some of the loop out of his swing so that he could hit fastballs better. It's incredible what a difference this adjustment made. He was terrible in June and July, utterly hopeless.
Posted by: James T at October 3, 2008 10:18 AM
As much as I love Dustin Pedroia, I'd prefer that he not win the AL MVP. I'd be content if none of the Red Sox players win any major awards (with the exception of the Rookie of the Year award) and just keep winning World Series championships.
Posted by: Allan at October 5, 2008 8:13 PM